This while not fixing the problems that are making people choose Avid over Premiere. Adobe hasn't resolved most of the critical issues that were there for several years, but instead they're coming up with tiny glittery new functions like h265. I mean Premiere CC has several critical bugs that are fucking up the workflow of any professional filmmaker. Adobe is pretty bad at coming up to date, especially with the software itself and its problems. I could even send a file to AE, do something there and then go back to Premiere and play that in real time without even rendering. I had a GTX660 in my previous PC and I was getting way better playback performance than the D300 with openCL. Tried After Effects rendering with the untested Raytracer - it just doesn't render.ĭaVinci shows the card in there but it's not using it for computing. This is something that Adobe needs to fix within the software. Didn't feel like I was getting any better playback performance. I then restarted, unplugged the eGPU, opened up the project, turned off the mercury playback engine, restarted, plugged in eGPU, opened up project, it worked. Turns out it was because of the full screen playback setup which got confused and just crashed the program. I tried to open up a project I was working on and every time I opened it with the eGPU plugged in, it crashed. Yes, I can choose CUDA for rendering but it doesn't seem like it's doing anything though. Edited Februby also tried my GTX970 with Premiere 2015.2 on a 2013 Mac Pro. I don't think it will change the situation, but i'm not an expert. Months ago it was working fine!ĮDIT: now I noticed that i have to update CUDA drivers to a new version, maybe that's the problem, but i can't understand why having the old one means that it couldn't work like always before, only because there's a new one. Tomorrow i'll try with and without eGPU plugged in. I didn't test rendering/workflow speed in After Effects and Davinci. In Davinci i can see that the used GPU is the 970 and not the integrated intel. I've also seen in after effects that i can select GTX970 CUDA for raytracing instead of the integrated intel (but with the alert message that 970 isn't tested by adobe). So it's like Premiere it's using GTX970 but it doesn't make any difference in the "speed" of the program. But i also seen that when I plug eGPU in the thunderbolt port I can choose the "mercury engine CUDA", while without plugging the eGPU i can select only "mercury software only" or "mercury OpenGL". So i tried a rendering with and without the eGPU and it took the same time. Today I was using premiere and i noticed that it was very slow also in the viewer while i was working in the timeline, i couldn't get a good "real time" view. But in these days I'm doing again a lot of editing and i need my eGPU performance. In the next months I didn't work on heavy video editing and I was always using my mac without eGPU plugged in. Davinci wasn't telling me that i couldn't use CUDA (I always got that alert message before installing eGPU) while in premiere i wasn't able to find any information but i'm sure, it was a lot faster in rendering. In the first month I installed eGPU (november 2015) i tried editing and rendering in premiere and a quick test of colour grading in davinci. I use adobe premiere and davinci resolve. Hi guys, i'm using MacBook Pro 15" retina mid2014 ( intel iris only) with a gtx970 g1 gigabyte and akitio thunder2. but I am just missing something in my setup/build?Īny help, hints and pointers much appreciated! So that was the reason why I got the eGPU in the first place: I'd rather spent X$ and double my GPU-performance instead of paying Y$ and get the same old MacBook.ĭid I fool myself here cause I should have made the repairs anyways? Unfortunately Apple won't repair my MacBook for free since my warranty has expired. Not even the GPU-sniffer or CUDA-Z are working:įYI: my MacBook has this technical glitch you might have heard of: ![]() Without you I would not have been able to set up my current build.Ħ) external Monitor – directly hooked up to the Graphics Card, NOT via TBĮverything seems to go well – but unfortunately NONE of my Adobe-products are working! Grid Dimensions: 2147483647 x 65535 x 65535įirst off: shout outs and many thanks to everyone else here. Do my stats look right for my 980 Ti in Cuda-Z? Yea but now maybe I'm thinking it could be how my Akitio is powered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |